The title of the post is a mouthful, and so is the connection I am trying to draw in my blog. Its a long shot, by any stretch. Let me start by breaking down the challenge.
Now, let me try and breaking down the hypothesis.
Apart from that we can take apart, the firm's architecture, as well as performance in relation to that architecture.
Hopefully we will learn something along the way.....
The challenge
Understanding technology firms as an investment is tough. Most standard metrics are not easy to explain the valuation of the firm and the risk in the assumptions. Most Technology firms start off as product firms with differentiated offerings, and end up as becoming solution companies for a specific market segment, or monopolies within their markets. The latter is more true for the really successful companies.Now, let me try and breaking down the hypothesis.
The hypothesis
The hypothesis is, that true indicator of a technology firm's future is the architecture that they adopt. This is because, the architecture determines how well the organization's offerings are aligned with their strategy.The Evidence
There is quite a lot of evidence on this topic, though mostly anecdotal. This includes insightful blogs from ex-employee, on how Amazon's single minded focus on Services Oriented Architecture (SOA), allowed it to develop a platform for buying and selling goods, and even general computing.Apart from that we can take apart, the firm's architecture, as well as performance in relation to that architecture.
Hopefully we will learn something along the way.....